Google’s SideWiki Shifts Power To Consumers –Away From Corporate Websites

Yesterday, Google announced “SideWiki” a new feature of the Firefox and IE browsers (Chrome to come soon) that allows anyone to contribute comments about any webpage –including this one. The impacts are far reaching, now every web page on the internet is social and can have consumer opinion –both positive and negative.

Control Over the Corporate Website Is Shifting To The Customers:

  • Customers trust each other more than you –now they can assert their voices “on” your webpage. Every webpage on your corporate website, intranet, and extranet are now social. Anyone who accesses these features can now rely on their friends or those who contribute to get additional information. Competitors can link to their competing product, consumers can rate or discuss the positive and negative experiences with your company or product.
  • Yet, don’t expect everyone to participate –or contribute valuable content. While social technology adoption is on the rise, not everyone writes, rates, and contributes content in every location, likely those who have experienced the product, influential, or competitors will be involved. Secondly, content created in this sidebar may be generally useless. To be successful, Google will need it to look more like Wikipedia than YouTube comments
  • Expect Google to integrate this feature with existing systems. Google recently launched profiles, a feature that is the foundation for extending their social reach. With large social networks like Gmail already in place (That’s right, email is a social network) they can eventually sort content on SideWiki by context of friends, experts, or other sources.  Google’s strategy is to ‘envelope’ the web this is typical of their approach.
  • Although early, expect other social networks to launch competing features. Facebook has already created an ‘inlay’ so you can view links shared in the Facebook newspage in the context of your friends –expect them to grow this feature out shortly.

Recommendations for the Web Strategist:  Develop a Social Strategy Now

  1. Shift your thinking: recognize that you don’t own your corporate website –your customers do. Accept the mindshift that your job is to not only serve up product and corporate content but to also be a platform and enabler for customers to discuss, share, and make suggestions to how you should improve what you offer.
  2. Develop a social strategy with dedicated resources. With every webpage now potentially social, you’ll need to develop a process, roles, and policy to ensure you’re monitoring the conversation, participating as you would in blog discussions, and influencing the discussion.  80% of success is developing an internal strategy, providing education before a free-for-all happens with customers and employees.
  3. Don’t be reactive to negative content –embrace social content now. Give users the ability to leave social feedback directly on your corporate webpages, or aggregate existing social content.  CMS vendors are developing features to enable this, as well as community platform vendors like Kickapps, Pluck, Liveworld’s Livebar offer rapid deployment options.

I predicted Google would be one of the first to do this, however I expected them to start with Chrome, not FF and IE. Expect this to be a default feature of Chrome –not just a plugin in future efforts.

Update: Just saw an interesting tweet from @prem_k about impacts to CRM. He’s Right. CRM systems (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle, Rightnow and others) will need to aggregate content in Google’s Sidewiki. It’s not just CRM, Brand Monitoring companies (Radian6, Buzzmetrics, Cymfony, Visible Technologies) will also need to “suck in” that data.

Update 2, a few hours later: We should stop to think about how competitors could display ads “on” your corporate site and you couldn’t stop it, why? Take a look at Google’s business model, they envelop and categorize the web, then display ads on it. There’s nothing stopping them from allowing advertisers to put ads on SideWiki as “sponsored” information. For example, Coke could run their latest ads on the Pepsi.com SikeWiki area. HP could run ads on the Dell.com site. This *already* happens in the search engine result pages on Google.com why not in sidewiki?

Update 3, the next day: I just tried out SideWiki to see how it works. I came to this very post and found out that there are already three comments. I left a comment welcoming folks, and it gave me the option to Tweet it, which I did. Here’s what sidewiki looks like, you don’t never have to have the plugin for this to work. Which means that this certainly has lower barriers to adoption. A few other field notes? I no longer have to fuss with captacha on blogs or name/email/url once I’m logged in to SideWiki, I can comment around the web. Secondly, it centralizes all my comments on my Google profile tool. You do see what Google is doing right? They are turning the whole web into a social network.

  • Pingback: Revealing Google’s Stealth Social Network Play « Web Strategy by Jeremiah Owyang | Social Media, Web Marketing

  • Pingback: Fusion View » Blog Archive » Anyone can comment anytime anywhere

  • Pingback: ZenGuide » Comment is a Free-for-All

  • Pingback: Google Sidewiki and Implications for Pharma Brands

  • Pingback: Google’s SideWiki Shifts Power To Consumers –Away From Corporate Websites « 29th Day

  • Pingback: Toujours plus de surcouches sociales pour vos sites web | MKT planet - News Web Marketing - Nouvelles Technologies

  • Pingback: Google Sidewiki: Allow Others to Post Comments on Your Web Site «

  • http://www.tedlsimon.posterous.com Ted Simon

    This is a fascinating development. Thanks for the post and updates. I can see why so many are getting excited about how this may further the social revolution, or at the very least intrigued (I know I am).

    But, like a few others who have posted concerns, I have some misgivings about this development. Seems to me that some rights should be reserved for the site owner to have some degree of control on his/her site. A lot of time and effort goes into the planning, development, execution and maintenance of a site that is intended to serve a designed purpose. Free access to comment in “sidebars” may distract, or even obstruct, a site owner from pursuing that purpose.

    Don’t get me wrong — I’m all in favor of consumer power, engagement practices, listening, et al. I also see a lot of value for companies who learn to utilize the social technologies to listen, understand, and take action on the feedback and learning they get from the community. It’s where we are and we are not going back.

    But, while I’m a free speech advocate, there’s that Supreme Court ruling that says the First Amendment doesn’t include the right to yell “fire!” in a crowded movie theater. There are lots of people with major impulse-control or maturity issues out there who would have the chance to do the movie theater “fire!” shout equivalent on any site. A few malicious miscreants could essentially “hijack” an “innocent” site, company or cause. They could lie, damage reputations (of people and companies)…and probably a lot of things I can even think of. Call me old-fashioned, but that does not seem right.

    I’d like to know more about the controls and safeguards against this sort of “site hijacking” and other potential malicious abuses. Hopefully there’s been some thought put into this. If Google’s mission really includes to “do no evil,” then they need to be looking at this long and hard…unless that “do no evil” thing is a bunch of PR hooey.

    Having expressed concerns, I’m hopeful that there are some safeguards and that this tool is one that can be used by consumers to properly comment and by companies to effectively listen, learn and respond. No matter what, one thing is clear: it’s time to start game-planning for this, if you haven’t already.

  • http://www.orangecaster.com/social-media/ Derick Schaefer

    Jeremiah, congrats on a great post with solid advice. I wrote a post on our blog using yours as a foundation but took on the theme of why I think Sidewiki will fail. Why doesn’t Google take an approach of starting to index and provide data on social media content related to search results before they try to become a source of social media content? I’m thinking the next Google home page should be a cross between Digg, SEO Tools for Firefox, and the existing home page. Sidewiki is a couple of steps beyond that.

    Anyway, thanks for the good post. Would be interested in your opinion as to whether you think Sidewiki will be wildly successful.

  • Pingback: Wide Angle » Social Media: The Dangers of Discovery

  • Pingback: Annotating the web: Diigo vs. Google Sidewiki « e-Rambler

  • Pingback: Google vs Facebook : et si la guerre de Troie avait de nouveau lieu ? @ quip in touch, actus digitales

  • Pingback: Corporate Communications and Social Media: Genie Will Not Return to Bottle | Corporate Eye

  • Pingback: Social Impacts Every Customer Touchpoint « Web Strategy by Jeremiah Owyang | Social Media, Web Marketing

  • laurie58

    Jeremiah,

    1) I disagree. Control is not a myth. I don't particularly care what the heck people are saying elsewhere, unless it is slanderous. However, it's outrageous that I could be spammed and slandered on my own website, not to mention that advertisements could be placed there as well! C'mon, Google has crossed the line big time. I built the site. I pay for the hosting and the domain. I should be able to control what appears there.

    2) Congratulations to the NYT!

    Google is now Big Brother, yet many of you here seem not to care? You are so tied into the social web that you wear blinders. You seem to think there should be no privacy, and no right to website control.

  • laurie58

    Jeremiah,

    1) I disagree. Control is not a myth. I don't particularly care what the heck people are saying elsewhere, unless it is slanderous. However, it's outrageous that I could be spammed and slandered on my own website, not to mention that advertisements could be placed there as well! C'mon, Google has crossed the line big time. I built the site. I pay for the hosting and the domain. I should be able to control what appears there.

    2) Congratulations to the NYT!

    Google is now Big Brother, yet many of you here seem not to care? You are so tied into the social web that you wear blinders. You seem to think there should be no privacy, and no right to website control.

  • laurie58

    Jeremiah,

    1) I disagree. Control is not a myth. I don't particularly care what the heck people are saying elsewhere, unless it is slanderous. However, it's outrageous that I could be spammed and slandered on my own website, not to mention that advertisements could be placed there as well! C'mon, Google has crossed the line big time. I built the site. I pay for the hosting and the domain. I should be able to control what appears there.

    2) Congratulations to the NYT!

    Google is now Big Brother, yet many of you here seem not to care? You are so tied into the social web that you wear blinders. You seem to think there should be no privacy, and no right to website control.

  • laurie58

    Jeremiah,

    1) I disagree. Control is not a myth. I don't particularly care what the heck people are saying elsewhere, unless it is slanderous. However, it's outrageous that I could be spammed and slandered on my own website, not to mention that advertisements could be placed there as well! C'mon, Google has crossed the line big time. I built the site. I pay for the hosting and the domain. I should be able to control what appears there.

    2) Congratulations to the NYT!

    Google is now Big Brother, yet many of you here seem not to care? You are so tied into the social web that you wear blinders. You seem to think there should be no privacy, and no right to website control.

  • Pingback: Finding: Social CRM Vendors Don’t Walk The Talk « Web Strategy by Jeremiah Owyang | Social Media, Web Marketing

  • Pingback: Finding: Social CRM Vendors Don’t Walk The Talk » A Day in the Life of Jonathan “Jon” Gillardi… aka “Johnny Montana”

  • Pingback: Google SideWiki «

  • Pingback: finding: social crm vendors don’t walk the talk « host spy

  • Pingback: Online Reviews Rule With Google’s Sidewiki

  • Pingback: Sarah Lynn Design » Blog Archive » The #1 Secret to Design Success

  • http://www.crabzy.com/ Jonh

    Sidewiki – Crabzy – same but less powerfull.
    I believe Sidewiki is nothing more than what offers Crabzy, and even less because Crabzy offers forum's functionalities, where you can have dialogs, exchanges between users.
    I'd rather go to Crabzy.com, but they both offer great value as this kind of service, if more developped, could really enrich the Web !!!!
    For everyone's benefit !!!!

  • http://www.crabzy.com/ Jonh

    Sidewiki – Crabzy – same but less powerfull.
    I believe Sidewiki is nothing more than what offers Crabzy, and even less because Crabzy offers forum's functionalities, where you can have dialogs, exchanges between users.
    I'd rather go to Crabzy.com, but they both offer great value as this kind of service, if more developped, could really enrich the Web !!!!
    For everyone's benefit !!!!

  • no1millmo

    I personally don't like the idea. Now a days, there are so many people out there that will post things/lies just to make your website look bad. Don't these people have anything better to do, then to cause havoc for other people that want to succeed?

  • jrhgh5hi6hy9iouim
  • http://www.wheelmax.com Rims

    Con grates!
    I personally don't like the idea. Now a days, there are so many people out there that will post things/lies just to make your website look bad. Don't these people have anything better to do, then to cause havoc for other people that want to succeed.
    Thank u for this web.

  • http://www.nikemaxsale.com air max shoes

    Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum!

  • http://pinnaclesecurity.com/wireless-security-systems.php wireless home security

    Browsing on Google for something else closely connected, regardless before i ramble on too much i would just like to state how much I cherished your post, I've added your web blog and also obtained your Feed, Again thank you very much for the article carry on the good work.

  • http://www.duzcem.net/ düzce haber

    However, they don't have the mainstream appeal as Google –that's where adoption can go mainstream.

  • http://www.cecenajans.com imkander

    İmkander

  • Pingback: Google’s Sidewiki – Evil or Awesome – The Jury’s Out

  • http://www.propertyguide24.com Mallorcafinca1

    This is very, very interesting information…
    Thanks
    Regards

  • Pingback: SideWiki Breaking the Net in Half! – Agency New Business

  • Pingback: sony ps vita

  • Pingback: Boainfo

  • Pingback: Android Tablets UK

  • Pingback: Bringing the Conversation Home – Google Sidewiki Overview | Fleishman-Hillard in Canada

  • Pingback: seo link monster,seo tool,best seo tool,seo software tool,seo softw

  • Pingback: AboutFace Media | Control Over the Corporate Website is Shifting to the Customers

  • Pingback: Nike zapatillas Hombre

  • Pingback: Tyinternety.cz | Google SideWiki: pravidla hry se zásadně mění