Above: I’m thinking about the differences between traditional marketing agencies and social media agencies, this video by Jim the founder of Ignite Social Media agency does a good job explaining the difference. I like how he points out how putting ads on sites, or doing link backs for SEO don’t qualify as engaging in two-way dialog.
Above: Andrew Vascellari gives a comedic rendition of what not to look for in a social media agency, starting with this must read list from Geoff Livingston (update: with Beth Harte).
16 Responses to “Social vs Traditional Marketing Agencies”
Leave a Reply
Jobs for the Web Strategist- Account Executive - Digital/Online Video at MS&L (New York, New York)
- Digital Marketing Manager at Red Bull North America (Santa Monica, California)
- Corporate Blog/Social Networking Manager - 20538 at Sony Electronics (San Diego, California)
- Copywriter (part time) at Carroll Enterprises, Inc. (Worcester, Massachusetts)
- Social Media Project Manager at Creative Labs, Inc. (Milpitas, California)
- Director of Social Media Marketing at PTC (Massachusetts)
About
Jeremiah Owyang
Silicon Valley
The views expressed on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer, Forrester Research.
Affiliations and Rankings
Hi Jeremiah. To be honest, the first video did not give me a clear impression of what the major difference between social and traditional media agencies is. I work for a digital marketing agency as social media strategist. But in fact, a lot of our work is all about microsites and suff like that (rather traditional digital media). We also bring content and tech guys together at one table without necessarily calling that social media. So, what’s the difference? In my opinion it’s the scope. Because an agency in a dialogue which has to keep track of a conversation for months has a completely different task to agencies which launch a project after 2-3 months of work…and then it’s done…
Posted by Gerald Hensel on January 2nd, 2009 at 11:06 am
Thanks, Jeremiah. I would like to make sure my compatriot in crime Beth Harte gets equal credit for the list. It was really just a bit of a spoof that became much bigger.
Posted by Geoff Livingston on January 2nd, 2009 at 11:25 am
Hi Jeremiah, thanks for picking up the list that Geoff Livingston and I worked on…it was a bit off the cuff and surprisingly generated a lot of great conversation, which is always insightful. Andrea did a spectacular job with his video version and additions to the list.
Posted by Beth Harte on January 2nd, 2009 at 11:49 am
With all due respect to Jim, I think he’s underestimating the sophistication of integrated agencies. It’s obviously true that social media engagement is different from advertising or PR, but I believe that fact is well understood by most reasonably intelligent ad and PR agencies. There are just as many advantages to working with an integrated agency as there are disadvantages, assuming, of course, that the agency in question understands the nuances of the various types of engagements they undertake and have dedicated staff and demonstrable experience in those domains.
In the end, social media comes down to interpersonal interactions, so it’s really down to the individuals who work on a particular piece of business, not necessarily the agency name or business model.
Posted by Mark Logan on January 2nd, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Hi Jeremiah - thanks so much for sharing the videos. It’s also worth checking out this checklist for choosing a Social Media agency:
http://wearesocial.net/blog/2008/12/how-to-choose-a-social-media-agency/
Posted by Robin Grant on January 2nd, 2009 at 5:08 pm
Alright, that was disorganized - Jeremiah please delete my first response…let me try once more in two sentences of 140 characters or less:
-You don’t need a whole agency dedicated to social media - your current marketing/PR firm should by now be able to fill that role.
-If not, get a new marketing/PR firm because splitting your communications will fragment things too much and kill consistency.
Posted by Adam Singer on January 2nd, 2009 at 6:30 pm
The problem I see rising up is that we are creating another silo called social media with the effect that we once more don’t integrate with other silos like media or strategy. We draw lines where our customers don’t see one and so we fail.
The reason why I joined a big marketing agency (Razorfish in Germany) as a social media strategist is to create integrated campaigns for clients which have the individual mix of strategy, media, analytics and social media for that client. I don’t want my own department. I want to sit next to the media people, have constant discussions with the analytics guys and argue with strategy to create synergies. Boutique agencies simply can’t offer that.
Posted by Johannes Kleske on January 3rd, 2009 at 12:51 am
Thanks for this posts. I like the 2nd video and realize that I have made some of the same mistakes along the way. Keep these kind insights coming, Cheers!
Posted by Rod on January 3rd, 2009 at 11:09 am
Oh dear — how ironic that Jim uses a communication that looks and sounds remarkably close to a traditional ad of the most conventional kind (talking head), with a cluttered, fairly dull script, to convey that his agency is a specialist that knows how to leverage the dynamics of social media for a new kind of communication. Not entirely convincing.
Posted by Stephen Rothman on January 4th, 2009 at 11:04 am
http://www.crackunit.com/2007/03/26/10-reasons-why-digital-is-better-than-advertising-number-1/
Iain Tait does this debate really well in presentations and the blog articles of which I think there are 8 now are also very good.
Posted by Rory Yates on January 4th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
[...] | Jeremiah Owyang Entradas [...]
Posted by eTc :: El blog de Marketing en Español » Blog Archive » Qué hace una agencia de Social Media on January 5th, 2009 at 7:32 am
Thanks for sharing the video Jeremiah!
+ I’m glad people liked it
All the inspiration came from the first 25 great points by Geoff & Beth.
And now after reading your post and watching Jim… who knows
probably I’ll record another video but this time about ‘Social vs Traditional Marketing Agencies’
Andrea
Posted by Andrea Vascellari on January 6th, 2009 at 7:40 am
@Jeremiah: Thanks for embedding the video, even though it’s about 18 months old and, as Stephen pointed out, not exactly cutting edge at this point.
Re @Mark Logan, a LOT of the integrated agencies don’t get social media at the granular level, which is often why our clients come to us. Or, they have people that do get it, but no efficient way to bring them onto the team, because the current team members think they understand it–that’s most dangerous.
Having said that, there can be value in an integrated agency, or there’s value in using us, or value in a combination. It depends on the situation.
Since I made that video, though, we’ve been hired by Intel, Nature Made, The Body Shop, Comcast and others, all of whom have access to large agencies. In some cases, we work with large agencies like Razorfish or Ogilvy, and that’s worked quite well.
Maybe I should get Andrea to redo my video? Update it a bit?
~Jim
Posted by Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Media on January 6th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Jim
Go for it, update it.
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on January 6th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
[...] of one of our favorite Social Media “Experts” Jeremiah Owyang in his blogpost Social vs. Traditional Marketing Agencies.SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “What Defines a Social Media Expert?”, url: [...]
Posted by What Defines a Social Media Expert? | Social Media Strategy | Square Martini Media on January 29th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
[...] Social vs Traditional Marketing Efforts - Jeremiah Owyang (Web Strategy with Jeremiah) This post features a short video (1:54) where Jim, the founder of Ignite Social Media explains the difference in traditional marketing agencies and social media marketing agencies. There’s some clear distinctions, certainly worth 2 minutes. [...]
Posted by Ryan Stephens Marketing » 21 Essential Blog Posts from Janurary ‘09 on April 26th, 2009 at 8:55 pm