Glassdoor, a social website that lets employees rate and rank previous and current jobs, approval rating of your CEO (much like the presidential approval ratings) as well as share salaries, is slowly getting traction. I login every few weeks to see slow steady growth. If you’re in a management position or are in HR, I highly recommend you read the reviews and ratings that your employees are saying.
If you notice decision, and see a trend of similar complaints, there’s two things to realize: 1) Your internal feedback loop is probably not working, therefore employees are letting grievances air in public to customers, investors, and the board. 2) There are probably some issues that you may want to resolve and fix.
There are a few weaknesses with Glassdoor that we should take into account: 1) There’s still very little data, most companies just have a smattering of reviews, 2) All data is anonymous so it’s very difficult to track –or prove –that someone actually worked at the company. It would be interesting if they were able to anonymously approve accounts in LinkedIn thereby secretly verifying identities. 3) Unhappy employees and happy employees will reflect their attitude –and service– to customers, so be sure to acknowledge one of your most important assets.
Also, if a company is just getting smeared by it’s employees, a company should address these problems, as although you could block the site from work, people will access it at home.
For what it’s worth, I’m making it a rule not to publicly rate my current employer on these types of sites, although I’m likely to rate them after I move on. Instead, I’m more likely to be forth coming in internal discussions, in an effort to improve things, rather that say it in public.
As we move to new jobs, we’ll be looking at the reviews of future companies on Glassdoor (just as we review financials) before I accept a position, but will appropriately weight it depending on age of comments, number of total reviewers, and patterns for trends.
Although Glassdoor shows some data in public, if you’re curious to see what employees think of your company (or how much people make in other companies) you’ll have to register, and complete part of the submission process in order to see details.
Have you peered into the glassdoor? Were you surprised or did you get confirmation?
This entry was posted on Monday, July 21st, 2008 at 8:48 am and is filed under Social Media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
17 Responses to “Glassdoor: What Your Employees Think of You”
Leave a Reply
- Advertising
- Aggregation
- Altimeter
- Analyst
- API
- Asia
- Augmented Reality
- Blogger Dinner
- Book Review
- Career
- Case Study
- Challenges
- Citizen Journalism
- CMO
- Collaboration
- Community Manager
- Community Marketing
- Conference
- Content Management System
- Content Management Systems
- Culture
- Curated Social Content
- Data Portability
- Data Storage
- Digest
- eCommerce
- Economy
- Enterprise Web
- Ethics
- Europe
- Events
- Extranet
- Facebook Strategy
- Fansumer
- FAQ
- Feedback
- Forbes
- Forrester
- Funding
- Future of Social Web
- Generations
- Geo Tagging
- Global Web
- Groundswell
- Hitachi
- Hitachi Data Systems
- Identity
- Industry Index
- Information Architecture
- Intelligent Web
- Interactive Marketing
- Interview
- Intranet
- IPTV
- IT
- Job Survey
- Legal
- Live Video
- Mashups
- Media 2.0
- Microformat
- MicroMedia
- MicroMeme
- Mmorpg
- Mobile
- MySpace
- Non Profit
- On the move
- OpenSocial
- Other
- Personalization
- Platform
- Podcasts
- Podtech
- Politics
- Pollination
- PR
- Privacy
- Process
- Publication
- Quicktake
- Reading Sampler
- Rich Media
- Ruminations
- Search Strategy
- Second Life
- Security
- Silicon Valley Sightings
- Social CMS
- Social Computing
- Social CRM
- Social Graph
- Social Media
- Social Media Job
- Social Media Measurement
- Social Media Services
- Social Media Stats
- Social Networking
- storyboard
- Support
- Sustainable
- Syndication
- Technographics
- Technology
- Travel
- Trends
- User Experience
- VCs
- Venture Capital
- Video
- Virtual Events
- Virtual World
- Voice of the Customer
- VoIP
- Walkthrough
- Web Advertising
- Web Analytics
- Web Design
- Web Industry
- Web Law
- Web Marketing
- Web Strategy
- Web Strategy Show
- Web Team
- Web Theory
- Web Tools
- Web Usage
- White Label Social Network
- Widget Strategy
- Wireless
- Word of Mouth
- Word of Mouth Marketing
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
-
Jobs for the Web Strategist- Social Media Online Community Manager at Bronx High School of Science Alumni Association (Bronx, New York)
- Community Manager at Warner Bros. Records (Burbank, California)
- Online Marketing Manager at InXpo (San Francisco, California)
- Director of Community at Answers.com (WikiAnswers) (New York, New York)
- Digial Influence Strategists at Ogilvy PR (San Francisco, California)
- Digital Influence Strategists - SEO Experts at Ogilvy PR (District of Columbia)
- Fees from these job postings pay for web hosting
My Flickr Photos















Surely the biggest weakness is the fact that it’s not a representative/random sample of employees, so a company is more likely to either have a very positive or very negative skew.
Posted by Niall Cook on July 21st, 2008 at 9:41 am
Those weaknesses you mention are indeed significant if one looks at this site from a researcher’s perspective. However, taking a corporate communicator’s (or even a CEO’s) perspective, those weaknesses are nearly 100 percent irrelevant.
To compare, there’s nothing to suggest one blogger’s experience with a company is truly representative of the experiences had by the public at large, but that doesn’t stop some individual bloggers or blog posts creating all sorts of online brand management issues for the company.
So sure, a company could defend itself by saying, “Those complaints represent a microscopic fraction of our employees, so we don’t think it’s…yada yada yada.” But Jeff Jarvis was just a microscopic portion of Dell’s customer base…
Posted by Mike Keliher on July 21st, 2008 at 9:50 am
I agree Niall, there will definitely be skews… But more importantly, whether the “data” is correct or not, sites like these are indicative of the challenge companies will have in online reputation management as social media progresses. Beyond just in the areas of HR – people draw close to who they can trust (as a company and provider of a service/product).
Thank you for sharing you insights Jeremiah
Maria Reyes-McDavis
Posted by Marketing Masters Guide on July 21st, 2008 at 9:52 am
Mike/Maria,
I agree to an extent. I think Jeremiah missed that as one of the key weaknesses, not that it makes the trend in this or any other field insignificant.
Posted by Niall Cook on July 21st, 2008 at 10:03 am
After working at my company for a few years I am not surprised. I’d hope that HR will start looking at these kind of sites just as another form of feedback.
Then again, who are the people who fill out the ratings? Do they fill them out after getting fired…or after getting a big bonus? Who knows…
Posted by Chris Salazar on July 21st, 2008 at 10:44 am
This type of site has been tried before. Vault was the best known, but there are several others that have tried, including Jobster and several smaller HR consulting sites.
There’s an entire business built around the lie that is the exit survey ( I remember one employer who tried to get me to sign an agreement saying I’d never witnessed any sexual harassment. I laughed, and then paused, and said, “Really?”).
Much like the marketing adage that says that a happy customer tells 2 people, an angry customer tells 200, the basic premise of ex-empolyee reviews is flawed. People just aren’t excised about their past work unless they are mad. And smart people (in terms of managing their career) know it’s a bad idea to rant about a company because you may need them in the future.
It’s one of those ideas that keeps coming up because it sounds good, but there’s actually a negative effect, as the information is so hopefully biased.
And the final nail? Work experience is localized. A company with a terrible office or a terrible division may be great over 95% of the company. Or vice versa, as one bright spot in a dull corporation gives a false impression.
It’s far better to use your personal networks for this kind of thing, as it’s the people working, and not the corporation, that matters.
Posted by Jim Durbin on July 21st, 2008 at 10:55 am
Friends
If there are a hundreds of reviews from supposed employees, can we still say there’s no trend at stake?
One of the key points I made in the post is that it’s early days, the sample size is yet too small to deem relevant.
I do believe that aggregation across hundreds –maybe thousands– of employees in even a large corporation can be indicative of actual sentiment.
Perhaps what’s MOST important is that these opinions (representative or not) could potentially sway investors, current or future employees.
If we’re going to examine the opinions from employees, we should also examine Yelp, Cnet, Ebay and other voting tools, which may also suffer from the same trust issues.
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on July 21st, 2008 at 12:02 pm
well, if a company can use this to address/recify the biggest complaints of the most negative employees & identify/promote the things that make employees most full of praise, having the middle ground represented isn’t as important.
Posted by patricia on July 21st, 2008 at 1:43 pm
I definitely agree that this type of survey is hardly scientific or printe to bias/abuse. Yeah, it is not the end-all in forming an opinion about a company, but let’s face it, where there is smoke there is frequently a fire. If I was looking for a job right now, this might be a nice place to go to get some insightful *questions* to ask when the interviewer inevitably asks me, usually towards the end of the interview, if I have any questions about their company.
Posted by brian on July 21st, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Brian
Often recruiters like to tell you how great the company and role is, using glassdoor to glean key opposition questions to gain some reality may be very important. (Although the best thing to do is to ask existing customers)
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on July 21st, 2008 at 2:11 pm
I submitted a report on Glassdoor just out of sheer curiosity. What impressed me most about the website was their word requirement for submissions. Though it may lead to bloated reviews, I believe the overall effect with be more thorough and thought through reviews.
Like everything that’s user generated, you can’t take it as completely professional and unbiased, but it does give you a sense from many people in the company.
Posted by Joseph Young on July 21st, 2008 at 10:55 pm
When I was looking at glassdoor.com last month I was a bit disappointed to see that only a few businesses were listed to view without signing in.
Posted by Andy Dunbar on July 22nd, 2008 at 7:24 am
Andy
To see more, register, and give your own info, then you’ll see more.
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on July 22nd, 2008 at 7:37 am
I just cruised the Oracle page, a sample size is slowly building
529 Employee Salaries for Oracle
161 Employee Reviews for Oracle
If this keeps up, this could continue to grow to a large sample
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on July 22nd, 2008 at 7:41 am
[...] Glassdoor: What Your Employees Think of You Early days for this initiative – but a portent of things to come. Opinion aggregators are going to be a key feature of the social media landscape. (tags: transparency Trends) No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> [...]
Posted by links for 2008-07-28 « The social media revolution (in 15 minutes) on July 28th, 2008 at 10:53 am
[...] which I found by reading an excellent post from Web Strategist Jeremiah Owayang, may be another challenge in the belt of online reputation management for small to large [...]
Posted by Is GlassDoor.Com Another Threat to Business Online Reputation Management? | Marketing Masters Guide on August 1st, 2008 at 6:49 pm
[...] Glassdoor: What Your Employees Think of You [...]
Posted by 19+ Online reputation management super destinations and easy tips » Own Business on August 16th, 2008 at 11:20 am