TrendWatch: Comparing MicroMemes, Network Feeds, and MacroMemes

Categories: MicroMeme, Social Media, TrendsPosted on June 2nd, 2008

I want you to start thinking differently about how you get information. As you know from my postings, that trust is highest from our peers, we trust those that are like us, or our friends above all us.

Information delivery is evolving, we’re starting to get information on the open wide web from our friends and contacts (although email has been a medium for a long time).

TrendWatch: Anatomy of MicroMemes, Network Feeds, and MacroMemes:

1) Narrow: MicroMeme

MicroMemes are highly focused and targeted, delivering the information to you that your network and friends thinks is important. A few days ago, I interviewed the founder of Friendfeed, an example of a MicroMeme.

[MicroMeme: Information with your immediate network about what they think is the most important]

[Example: "Three of your friends think this article is great"]

LinkedIn displays “articles your colleagues are reading” as well as other companies. Colleagues are in your direct network, tying news to your social graph.

Upcoming, displays the top events from your friends, to find local events, perhaps a great way to get timely information from your network (per Scoble’s suggestion)

Google Reader recently added a “Friends Shared Items” which looks at gestures to determine what your contacts find is important. I credit Steve Gillmor for leading the theory on Gestures, I’d link to him, but he doesn’t prefer that.

Plaxo Pulse, recently acquired by Comcast, (keep an eye on this, I am) displays information that your network cares about. Picture from Terry Chay’s Flickr photos, used with Creative Commons attribution

Friendfeed, which I’ve already discussed shows information based upon your friends, pulling in all of their social streams.

Facebook’s Newspage (thanks to Jamie, in the comments) points out that it indicates weight of objects from your network such as ““5 of your friends are attending xyz concert on June 15th.”

2) Moderate: Network Feeds

Common in many social networks and feedreaders, they display the most recent information from your network but do not prioritize it based on anything but time. This is problematic over time, as we need to find what’s important in a sea of noise.

[Network Feed: The most recent information from your network, but not prioritized by your friends]

[Example: Today, your friends have joined a group, added a picture and yesterday, your sister went to a baseball game]

>
Feedreaders like MyYahoo or BlogLines don’t put weight on what your network thinks is important, and therefore just deliver content based upon most recent.

MySpace’s newspage shows alerts based on time, but does not prioritize or look for trends or memes.

3) Wide: MacroMeme

The most common form of how information was delivered for over 100 years is by industry and from an editor that you don’t know, and sometimes don’t trust. Although more advanced forms have appeared with news sites that use algorithms to find out what’s important.

[MacroMeme: Information about the things your industry thinks is important]

[Example: The top news stories today are Microsoft wanting to acquire Yahoo according to the New York Times]

New York Times has no social sorting of your content, nor does it prioritize information based upon your networks’ preferences. It’s sorted at the industry level although it offers various “popularity”.

Techmeme delivers industry related information for the tech industry, but it’s not sorted by social networks, or social preferences –unless you’re one of the few top bloggers that are actively involved.

Google News also displays information based upon industry perspective, but does offer a “popular” ranking.

Summary
Each of these information delivery systems serves a different purpose, none is better than the other, but it’s important to know that MicroMeme presentation is a trend on the rise. For many, MacroMemes will continue to be the way that information is delivered on the morning breakfast table, but as the next generation of information cravers arrive, information will start to be sorted by our social preferences.

Share This Post:

This entry was posted on Monday, June 2nd, 2008 at 3:55 am and is filed under MicroMeme, Social Media, Trends. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

21 Comments »

I’m struggling to see how you would define Facebook as any different to FriendFeed in the way it disseminates information from your network.

Consider the newsfeed. Right now I have the following:

“5 of your friends are attending xyz concert on June 15th.”

“3 of your friends commented on a mutual friends photo”

“2 of your friends were tagged in this photo”

“A friend suggests you add this mutual friend who has just joined Facebook”

In the bottom right corner there is a “people you may know” box displaying 3 people I know.

“4 of your friends joined the group Lower Fuel Price Petition”

“a friend is selling an Xbox 360 in the Marketplace”

“Jason Calacanis posted a news story”

“xyz commented on Jasons news story”

Posted by Jamie on June 2nd, 2008 at 6:01 am

Jamie, I forgot about that, you’re right, that is an example of a Micromeme, thank you, I’ll move it to the right category.

Posted by jeremiah_owyang on June 2nd, 2008 at 6:05 am

[...] that are like us, or our friends above all us. Information delivery is evolving, we??re startinghttp://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/06/02/trendwatch-comparing-micromemes-network-feeds-and-macr…The Distant Horizon Foreign Affairs MagazineDay of Empire: How Hyperpowers rise to Global [...]

Posted by sea level rise table on June 2nd, 2008 at 6:26 am

Jeremiah – you’ve created an interesting breakdown – almost academic in its granularity and effort to classify/categorize things. Helpful.

Posted by Don Jones on June 2nd, 2008 at 7:18 am

Crazy, how much stuff you can keep up with these days. Has there ever been a study on the mircomeme market. How much value are we creating for consumers generating this kind of content.

Posted by mathew on June 2nd, 2008 at 7:36 am

Thanks Don

Quite honestly, it’s a very hard concept to describe, glad you get it.

Mathew, no study formally, but as you can tell, I’m thinking about it.

Posted by jeremiah_owyang on June 2nd, 2008 at 8:07 am

Jeremiah:
This is really interesting. I too wonder how marketing will manage or speak to the meme.
Mary

Posted by Mary Greening on June 2nd, 2008 at 8:37 am

[...] Social Media is Web 2.0 – Relationships – New Linchpin for User Value June 2, 2008 Posted by John Furrier in Technology. Tags: online advertising, social media, web 2.0 trackback Mike Arrington weights in with his opinion of social media. He makes a relevant (pun intended) point – content spewing is clutter that creates noise which in turn makes relevance harder to filter. Timing couldn’t have been better with Jeremiah weighing in on what he sees as the big trends in social media. [...]

Posted by Social Media is Web 2.0 - Relationships - New Linchpin for User Value « Furrier.org - Business & Technology Blog on June 2nd, 2008 at 9:23 am

[...] TrendWatch: Comparing MicroMemes, Network Feeds, and MacroMemes Jeremiah Owyang provides food for thought about making sense of the various kinds of information available in social networks. [...]

Posted by 080602 Daily Links for June 02, 2008 for Recruiters | johnsumser.com: Recruiting News and Views on June 2nd, 2008 at 11:29 am

Mary

It’s going to be pretty challenging, as a MicroMeme pushes advertising to the side.

Posted by jeremiah_owyang on June 2nd, 2008 at 11:33 am

Jeremiah, you’ve certainly got the seeds of a useful concept in this post, but I’m assuming that you’ve got some follow-up articles planned?

Posted by Mark Dykeman on June 2nd, 2008 at 12:48 pm

Mark

It makes sense, I want this to a be a referencable post. It makes sense to do a case study or to look at some data on how each of these is effective.

Posted by jeremiah_owyang on June 2nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm

Jeremiah,

I am indebted to you for laying out such an informative post which helps me understand another set of Web 2.0 tools.

I just joined FriendFeed yesterday and was curious to the definitions of “micro-meme” and “macro-meme”.

My “light bulb” just illuminated!

Posted by Carlos R. Hernandez on June 2nd, 2008 at 3:13 pm

Carlos, glad to hear. You should be thinking about how you get your info now, each method is different –and each has it’s strengths and weaknesses.

Posted by jeremiah_owyang on June 2nd, 2008 at 3:57 pm

Jeremiah, the post is well laid out and the services and pictures clear and straightforward. However, and I know that you are open to other terms, I don’t think meme as a service or verb (almost) is the right word for what you are describing. A meme would be the concepts, ideas and culturally relevant items (for group, industry, world) that bubble up through these services. Perhaps they are meme machines (maybe we can get that fast talking micro machines dude to read all of that information out loud http://is.gd/pIM).

Posted by Marc Vermut on June 2nd, 2008 at 5:49 pm

Great post Jeremiah. Question: Since trends suggest that Micromeme will gain more acceptance and importance – do you think that Friendfeed would kill Google reader? I know Google Reader has the share feature but not many people do that…

Thoughts?

Posted by Prakash on June 3rd, 2008 at 2:24 am

Prakash

It’s too early to tell what’s going to happen. I’m sure we will do some formal surveys then analysis. Stay tuned.

Posted by jeremiah_owyang on June 3rd, 2008 at 6:40 am

[...] Memes das Web relevant machen! Jeremiah Owyang hat in einem lesenswerten Beitrag über verschiedene Verfahren der Informationsvermittlung geschrieben. Grundsätzlich gebe es dabei drei Möglichkeiten: MicroMemes, Network Feeds und [...]

Posted by » Nur Butter auf’s Brot: Wie Memes das Web relevant machen!, Blogpiloten.de - willkommen im wir.netz on June 3rd, 2008 at 11:27 pm

[...] Für die blogpiloten habe ich mich mit dem Thema beschäftigt und bin auf einen schönen Übersichtsbeitrag über Verfahren zur Informationsvermittlung von Jeremiah Owyang gestoßen. Er unterscheidet grundsätzlich [...]

Posted by Wegweiser im Informationsdschungel: MicroMeme, Network Feed und MacroMeme | Blog von Björn Rohles on June 4th, 2008 at 1:45 am

[...] TrendWatch: Comparing MicroMemes (Friendfeed), Network Feeds, and MacroMemes [...]

Posted by How Brands Will Use FriendFeed on June 10th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

[...] uses “macromeme” and “micromeme” to contrast content as packaged and prioritized by big, impersonal entities like The New York Times [...]

Posted by Memes: It’s Xeno & Oiko that Matter « socialglare on May 19th, 2009 at 3:35 am