Innovation: The Mirror, Window, and the Door
Categories: Enterprise Web, Web Industry, Web TheoryPosted on September 16th, 2007Dennis has responded to my Social Computing for the Product Life Cycle post, which is a “How to”. In his viewpoint he asks a different question, he wants to know “Why” and gives some examples of some industries where customer and community feedback isn’t a good idea. I could list a ton of industries where it does work (even shifting the “x”s over to the Yes in the industries he’s listed out) but I’d rather elevate the discussion.
We can draw upon our innovation to improve our businesses through a variety of strategies, I’ll break them down as the Mirror, the Window, and the Door.
The Mirror
Relying on the Enterprise (IT in particular) to lead progress in this new world isn’t the solution. Dennis observes,“I want to know how these processes get baked into existing systems. To date, I’ve seen almost no attempt at integrating social computing/media projects into the systems upon which industry depends. That should not be a surprise but it cannot be ignored.“.
This movement isn’t coming from IT, the CIO, or the powers-that-be. It’s coming from the people, the people who are using these easy-to-use tools to communicate and make their lives easier. I can’t think of any customers who are going to ask the permission of a CIO of a vendor before starting a blog or being involved in a brand forum on a third party. He suggests enterprise IT isn’t ready for the new world, and he’s right, the customers and savvy business units will just pass them up
Let’s stop looking in the mirror to see if this is being adopted, because the activity isn’t even happening in our own house.
The Window
Here’s where many of us are at now. For those who read this blog, or other blogs like it, we see the power shifting outside our windows. We’re looking out and see that customers are building websites in tribute to our brands, or are talking about how to make products better, or even how to fix them all together, we’re watching and learning.Dennis is right, I don’t want the “crowd” designing the brake system of my car, but I would sure want the experts in that industry who are designing them into my car to participate. I also want to buy a car that has involved customers as many areas of the product life cycle, form analyzing support requests (on their site and ours) getting customer feedback in real time, and involving advocates. In fact, for many of the products we buy, we’re going to lean on customers to lend their opinion.
For most, some are just peeking out of the window, amazed and scared to see that customers are building on our front lawn, some shut the blinds, and others open the window, one thing is for sure, it’s not going away.
The Door
Here’s the future, and maybe my post wasn’t ready for the market, or maybe just Dennis. It’s unavoidable that every brand will be impacted by social computing, it’s up to the product teams to determine if voices are to be included. The risk? The competitor may recognize this, harvest and benefit.For most, we’ve not even opened the door, welcomed the customers in our house, let them give input to our cooking, but the savvy companies will. To be fair, how far we’ll let them in our house depends, but let’s at least analyze the opportunities.
We’ll continue to see customers building their own community sites, not on the corporate website, to do nothing is missing the opportunity.
[In the end, we'll all have to move together, not just on the speed of enterprise (IT), but at the speed of the market and customers--they're not going to wait]
For what it’s worth, I’m no stranger to IT. I’ve worked in IT for 3 years, managed 2 enterprise intranets, and helped out with 2 others. I’ve also managed one enterprise extranet and have worked at 3 Enterprise IT companies (Web hosting, Telecom, and Enterprise Data Storage) who were selling to IT decision makers.














In reference to Dennis’ comment, “I don’t want the “crowd” designing the brake system of my car”:
Absolutely, you don’t want them to design it. That is what your engineers are for. But, what you want is for them to tell you that when they try to brake from driving 70 mph that the anti-lock system feels too loose (or whatever - I am far from a break expert) and it makes them very nervous. The point is that you take their impressions/issues about your product and ask your engineers to make changes that will resolve or exceed their issues.
Posted by Trevor Speirs on September 16th, 2007 at 12:54 pm
I like the analogy.
If I could build on it & say that traditional marketing looks in the mirror & says, ‘yes, we’re reaching our market. The customers will come to us because they need us & our campaigns show why.’
But the ad campaigns are in the mailbox (& spambox) and I agree with you Jeremiah, the customers are looking in the windows wondering if the companies are going to offer products with features & support that THEY want? Opening the window & talking with them about what you have to offer & to find out what they want will get their attn & hold it far longer than the traditional ad campaigns. WOM is powerful.
And yes if you open the door & invite the customer in to participate in betas & let them play with your product as you’re building it. Spend some time LISTENING to what they want & gain loyal followers who will tell their friends. Ignore them & run the risk of creating a product that is irrelevant… which in turn could make your company irrelevant.
Posted by Connie Bensen on September 16th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
I sort of wrote a similar post to this on my site when I came across a video by Loren Feldman called Anti-Social Media.
What you said in the post really provided an in-depth view of what he emphasised in his video about how we wouldn’t want social media because it is just “the crowds” and will not provide added value.
Posted by Jonathan Kok on September 16th, 2007 at 11:19 pm
Opening the door will require fluidity. Fluidity requires process change, but more importantly cultural change – and that’s why your comments are not ready for the market I fear. Requiring a change in culture will mean the door is firmly locked for many. It should be more of a case of looking to cast the net as wide as possible, and to see which part of the net catches something. To continue to look in the mirror serves only to mislead, remaining in the window, serves only to frustrate.
Posted by Paul Ferron on September 17th, 2007 at 5:32 am
Will the customers drive it or the Enterprise?
My concern is that Enterprise has the drapes drawn & refuses to look out the window.
Posted by Connie Bensen on September 17th, 2007 at 5:52 am
[...] Savvy brands will need to go to the streets, where the community is, and join the party in addition to continue building their own house out. This is why we need to open the door, after looking out the window, but not stare in the mirror. [...]
Posted by How Web 1.0 is like modern Las Vegas on November 13th, 2007 at 6:03 am