<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many spheres are there for the Web Strategist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/</link>
	<description>Jeremiah Owyang discusses how web tools and social media enable companies to connect with customers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:54:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Budde Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-1145053</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Budde Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-1145053</guid>
		<description>Jeremiah,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like both &quot;User Needs&quot; and &quot;Markets and Audiences&quot; would be covered under a different title such as &quot;Constituent Needs.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;User needs, audience needs and the needs of the market should have equal weighting in that sphere as product market fit has a direct effect on the user, the audience(in some instance&#039;s the user) and the user&#039;s needs directly affect the market needs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus given the audience, user and market at times having a distinct group of people the term &quot;Constituent Needs&quot; might be a better fit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah,</p>
<p>It seems like both &#8220;User Needs&#8221; and &#8220;Markets and Audiences&#8221; would be covered under a different title such as &#8220;Constituent Needs.&#8221;  </p>
<p>User needs, audience needs and the needs of the market should have equal weighting in that sphere as product market fit has a direct effect on the user, the audience(in some instance&#39;s the user) and the user&#39;s needs directly affect the market needs.</p>
<p>Thus given the audience, user and market at times having a distinct group of people the term &#8220;Constituent Needs&#8221; might be a better fit.</p>
<p>-Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-104181</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-104181</guid>
		<description>I guess it depends on how you define &quot;Users.&quot; If you consider &quot;users&quot; as the macro group of all people on the web (or frankly, all people period) than I think technically all groups would fall out of this term. But to Jonathan&#039;s point, you can&#039;t lump users of a specific site into the same group as those affected by the brand via other online contexts. I think the &quot;Market&quot; would consist of all entities that need to be addressed with your strategy, a subset of which would be your site users. The term &quot;market&quot; could even include &quot;non-human&quot; entities as well. My vote would be to keep the 3 spheres, rename &quot;User Needs&quot; to &quot;Market Needs&quot; and you are good to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it depends on how you define &#8220;Users.&#8221; If you consider &#8220;users&#8221; as the macro group of all people on the web (or frankly, all people period) than I think technically all groups would fall out of this term. But to Jonathan&#8217;s point, you can&#8217;t lump users of a specific site into the same group as those affected by the brand via other online contexts. I think the &#8220;Market&#8221; would consist of all entities that need to be addressed with your strategy, a subset of which would be your site users. The term &#8220;market&#8221; could even include &#8220;non-human&#8221; entities as well. My vote would be to keep the 3 spheres, rename &#8220;User Needs&#8221; to &#8220;Market Needs&#8221; and you are good to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-85451</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-85451</guid>
		<description>When I read Jeremiah&#039;s original post, he states &quot;Web Strategy is the long-term iterative process of defining the direction of a Web Site or Web Product. The Strategy must meet three goals: 1)Users, Business, and Technology to be succesful...Every website has a strategy...&quot;

To me that means primarily web sites and the users (or visitiors) to those websites.  People who have chosen to come to a certain site.  The site had to be created with them in mind.

I see the larger overall market, especially with much of the Web 2.0 technology that is discussed as a different animal.  Blogs, forums, social networking communities.  Conversations going on.  Maybe not about the product itself but the marketplace (what type of car should I buy?).

Maybe it&#039;s my background in PR that has me saying that a Web Strategist needs to know how all of these platforms - platfroms that decentralize the strategy - affect brands.  What we have now is much more dyanamic and conversational.  To me that goes beyond a user on a web site.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read Jeremiah&#8217;s original post, he states &#8220;Web Strategy is the long-term iterative process of defining the direction of a Web Site or Web Product. The Strategy must meet three goals: 1)Users, Business, and Technology to be succesful&#8230;Every website has a strategy&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>To me that means primarily web sites and the users (or visitiors) to those websites.  People who have chosen to come to a certain site.  The site had to be created with them in mind.</p>
<p>I see the larger overall market, especially with much of the Web 2.0 technology that is discussed as a different animal.  Blogs, forums, social networking communities.  Conversations going on.  Maybe not about the product itself but the marketplace (what type of car should I buy?).</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s my background in PR that has me saying that a Web Strategist needs to know how all of these platforms &#8211; platfroms that decentralize the strategy &#8211; affect brands.  What we have now is much more dyanamic and conversational.  To me that goes beyond a user on a web site.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-85412</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-85412</guid>
		<description>Web strategy can be about &#039;reading&#039; markets, because free markets ultimately reflect end-user needs...those services/sites/goods that users don&#039;t need will eventually fall out of the market, but those that users want will flourish until someone else can provide the same service either more effectively or to a higher level.

So I think that the market can be rolled into Users because ultimately the Users are the market.  Jonathan&#039;s explains part of the market/audience as:

&quot;web strategists need to know how their organizations and their products and /or service offerings are coming off via blogs, microblogs, online communities, forums, etc&quot;

This seems to me to be an issue of perception by the user, which rolls it back into the first element.  It certainly is a fine line dividing shades of gray, because in reality, none of these elements is completely separate from any of the others.

Certainly a thought provoking article!  Thanks, Jonathan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web strategy can be about &#8216;reading&#8217; markets, because free markets ultimately reflect end-user needs&#8230;those services/sites/goods that users don&#8217;t need will eventually fall out of the market, but those that users want will flourish until someone else can provide the same service either more effectively or to a higher level.</p>
<p>So I think that the market can be rolled into Users because ultimately the Users are the market.  Jonathan&#8217;s explains part of the market/audience as:</p>
<p>&#8220;web strategists need to know how their organizations and their products and /or service offerings are coming off via blogs, microblogs, online communities, forums, etc&#8221;</p>
<p>This seems to me to be an issue of perception by the user, which rolls it back into the first element.  It certainly is a fine line dividing shades of gray, because in reality, none of these elements is completely separate from any of the others.</p>
<p>Certainly a thought provoking article!  Thanks, Jonathan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremiah_owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-85290</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremiah_owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-85290</guid>
		<description>Joe

Interesting, I&#039;ve not heard that term used in such a way before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe</p>
<p>Interesting, I&#8217;ve not heard that term used in such a way before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Budde Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-85285</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Budde Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-85285</guid>
		<description>Jeremiah,

It seems like both &quot;User Needs&quot; and &quot;Markets and Audiences&quot; would be covered under a different title such as &quot;Constituent Needs.&quot;  

User needs, audience needs and the needs of the market should have equal weighting in that sphere as product market fit has a direct effect on the user, the audience(in some instance&#039;s the user) and the user&#039;s needs directly affect the market needs.

Thus given the audience, user and market at times having a distinct group of people the term &quot;Constituent Needs&quot; might be a better fit.

-Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah,</p>
<p>It seems like both &#8220;User Needs&#8221; and &#8220;Markets and Audiences&#8221; would be covered under a different title such as &#8220;Constituent Needs.&#8221;  </p>
<p>User needs, audience needs and the needs of the market should have equal weighting in that sphere as product market fit has a direct effect on the user, the audience(in some instance&#8217;s the user) and the user&#8217;s needs directly affect the market needs.</p>
<p>Thus given the audience, user and market at times having a distinct group of people the term &#8220;Constituent Needs&#8221; might be a better fit.</p>
<p>-Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremiah_owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-85275</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremiah_owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-85275</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve corrected it thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve corrected it thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/comment-page-1/#comment-85192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/21/how-many-spheres-are-there-for-the-web-strategist/#comment-85192</guid>
		<description>Jeremiah

Actually, I wrote it.  My name is Jonathan.  Also a biblical name come to think of it.  The name of the firm is Abraham Harrison.

Chris Abraham...Mark Harrison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah</p>
<p>Actually, I wrote it.  My name is Jonathan.  Also a biblical name come to think of it.  The name of the firm is Abraham Harrison.</p>
<p>Chris Abraham&#8230;Mark Harrison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
