[...] A six figure salary is pretty common for any median homeowner in the SF bay area. But for many, a six figure salary is still a benchmark into management. That’s why the ladders (a premiere recruiting site) helps employers and job seekers connect for a small fee. With the launch of Om’s recent entrepreneur webzine powered by PublicSquare has launched, I can see the need to connect with the highly qualified. [...]

I can’t comment on Jerimiah’s insights so much, since I’m not inside his brain, but what *we* find is blog tools don’t scale to multiple authors and workflows. Pageview wise, we’re all the same. Just drop us a note and we can cover your bandwidth in a seperate agreement if it’s way higher than our plans. We are on engineyard, and can handle what you throw at us.

The question of scaling is found in what you alluded to in your comment “This is a very large university system, with potentially many different content input streams. ”

When Boxesandarrows was on Movabletype, we had four blogs to manage content, a wiki and a basecamp, as well as mailing lists. Now we have PublicSquare. When we had multi-authors, we had to create a new author with the name “joe smith and fred lise.” Authors and editors communicated via email, stories were lost, authors would occasionally write me asking if their sotry was every going to go live. Our managing editors HATED movabletype — not because it’s a bad tool, because it was the WRONG tool. Now everything is under one roof, and if an editor or author goes awol, we know, and we can reassign.

If CMS means conversation managmeent system, that’s what we are. We’re kind a wordpress/basecamp mashup, and if you have more than two people in your system, we are a better choice.

Our documentation sucks (I admit freely, and we are working to fix) so please email me if you have any questions. I’m happy to help. I can also give you more details on Boxes and Arrows’ experience, or give you contact for the editorial staff there.