Inventory Check: Social Media Software Industry
Categories: Data Storage, Podcasts, Social Media, Video, Web Industry, Web ToolsPosted on March 20th, 2007Checking the Pulse
As someone who deals with corporations deploying social media to connect with customers, I’ve been watching and taking note of all the inventory out there, as sometimes I’m asked to suggest some software to clients. There’s a tremendous amount of options available to any company that wants to expand their web strategy to create collaborative and two-way websites. There’s some VCs out there that think there’s too many players and not enough innovation.
Web Software Taxonomy
I’ve taken tally of one niche of Web Software (Order) Social Software (Family), they are broken into groups (Genus), if you click on any of those links, you’ll see the specific company (Species).
Inventory of Social Media Software Industry:
Wikis
Over 60 different types of wiki software available, you can even compare features.
White Label (you can rebrand) Social Networking Software
I have a list of over 40 companies, it started with 8, and it continues to grow.
Blogging Software
29 flavors of software available.
Video Platforms
There are over 20 Online Video platforms. See my rant yesterday.
Podcast Directories
Over 140 directories listed.
Internet Forum Software packages
Over 50 software packages are available.Instant Messaging
Nearly 20 different clients (many don’t work together) available.Social Bookmarking
Over 25 services listed.
Online Data Storage
I’ve started a list of enterprise vendors, there’s also hundreds of startups that offer online data storage as a primary or secondary feature.
Online Office
There’s half a dozen or more online office suites, 9 online spreadsheet companies, 9 Online Word processors, and at least 8 Online Presentation tools.Online Photo Sharing
Over 100 services available (use the engine, and select show me all).
I remember the first internet boom
I was part of the first internet boom. I was at Exodus Communications (I still remember, and document it) which hosted many web startups in our data centers. Some of our clients were pets.com, and some other startups with ridiculous names (at the time) like “Google” and “Yahoo”. I remember an excess of startups entering the market, and then the shakeout occurred in 2000-2003, only the strong and unique survived. I suspect we’re getting close to that point where the shakeout will start to occur, hopefully, it won’t be another catastrophic event like Sept 2001.
Analysis:
Based upon this inventory, and my experience in the first boom, there are two stances I could logically take:
1) Software is differentiating and developing niche features for different groups and needs
or
2) There a excess of social software available.
I’m leaning towards the latter, how about you?
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 20th, 2007 at 6:49 am and is filed under Data Storage, Podcasts, Social Media, Video, Web Industry, Web Tools. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
10 Responses to “Inventory Check: Social Media Software Industry”
Leave a Reply
- Advertising
- Aggregation
- Analyst
- API
- Asia
- Blogger Dinner
- Career
- Case Study
- Challenges
- Citizen Journalism
- Collaboration
- Community Manager
- Community Marketing
- Conference
- Content Management System
- Content Management Systems
- Curated Social Content
- Data Portability
- Data Storage
- Digest
- eCommerce
- Economy
- Enterprise Web
- Ethics
- Europe
- Events
- Extranet
- Facebook Strategy
- Fansumer
- FAQ
- Feedback
- Forrester
- Funding
- Future of Social Web
- Generations
- Geo Tagging
- Global Web
- Groundswell
- Hitachi
- Hitachi Data Systems
- Identity
- Industry Index
- Information Architecture
- Intelligent Web
- Interactive Marketing
- Interview
- Intranet
- IPTV
- IT
- Job Survey
- Live Video
- Mashups
- Media 2.0
- Microformat
- MicroMedia
- MicroMeme
- Mmorpg
- Mobile
- MySpace
- Non Profit
- On the move
- OpenSocial
- Other
- Personalization
- Platform
- Podcasts
- Podtech
- Politics
- Pollination
- PR
- Privacy
- Process
- Publication
- Quicktake
- Reading Sampler
- Rich Media
- Ruminations
- Search Strategy
- Second Life
- Security
- Silicon Valley Sightings
- Social CMS
- Social Computing
- Social CRM
- Social Graph
- Social Media
- Social Media Job
- Social Media Measurement
- Social Media Services
- Social Media Stats
- Social Networking
- storyboard
- Sustainable
- Syndication
- Technographics
- Technology
- Travel
- Trends
- User Experience
- VCs
- Venture Capital
- Video
- Virtual World
- Voice of the Customer
- VoIP
- Walkthrough
- Web Advertising
- Web Analytics
- Web Design
- Web Industry
- Web Law
- Web Marketing
- Web Strategy
- Web Strategy Show
- Web Team
- Web Theory
- Web Tools
- Web Usage
- White Label Social Network
- Widget Strategy
- Wireless
- Word of Mouth
- Word of Mouth Marketing
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
-
Jobs for the Web Strategist- Copywriter (part time) at Carroll Enterprises, Inc. (Worcester, Massachusetts)
- Social Media Project Manager at Creative Labs, Inc. (Milpitas, California)
- Director of Social Media Marketing at PTC (Massachusetts)
- 2166 Global Digital Communications Manager at Ford Motor Company (Dearborn, Michigan)
- Online Connection Pastor at LifeChurch.tv (Edmond, Oklahoma)
- Search Marketing Analyst at OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network (Los Angeles, California)
- Fees from these job postings pay for web hosting
-
My Flickr Photos
About
Jeremiah Owyang
Silicon Valley
The views expressed on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer, Forrester Research.













I lean toward #2 as well. Just way too many products to keep track of, even though some of the more recent services are being created to fill a niche. Thanks for your inventory. It’s a great resource.
Posted by Connie Reece on March 20th, 2007 at 7:20 am
A great library of apps Jeremiah. Now we need a company to come in and teach everyone how to use all of these tools. Perhaps one big mashup is in order?
Posted by Jim Turner on March 20th, 2007 at 7:22 am
Oh mashups, I didn’t even want to list those.
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on March 20th, 2007 at 7:24 am
It’s definitely the latter, partly because collaboration is still a concept foreign to some (many?). In other ways, it’s because plans are developed without knowing the landscape of what’s already available.
In the midwest, I know of four (small) webdev companies trying to create their own blogging software. I’ve asked what they hope to gain by creating a new tool that hasn’t gone through the trials of others available. They want to ‘own’ it — and I don’t think they are even aware of the similarities between 1.0 & 2.0.
Posted by Mike Sansone on March 20th, 2007 at 8:48 am
Mike
I really hope you show them this list. Unless they’re doing something very unique, they’re wasting their time and money.
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on March 20th, 2007 at 9:06 am
I used to map all of the datacenters around the world, the fiber going in and the tenants to come up with utilization patterns that used by clients for strategic planning. Clients used to go bananas over the data, extremely useful to companies running fiber.
There is an excess of me-too social software. Same people making same mistakes all over again. The lack of historical vision in the internet world continues to stagger. The problem is that with startup costs so low, once these services are running, they can continue on at a low burn rate. See online dating as an example. 1,000+ sites, 25 major players, the rest existing in a tenuous balance between new subscribers, marketing dollars, PageRank and making enough to keep the lghts on.
Posted by David Evans on March 20th, 2007 at 9:45 am
I’m leaning towards number 2 but the proof will be in the profit and loss statements of these companies. You can’t lose money forever.
One thing that I like about the environment though is the fact that because there is so much competition, it keeps everyone on their toes.
The ones that do survive the shake-out will be (in general) the cream of the crop.
Posted by Chris R. on March 20th, 2007 at 9:55 am
Definitely #2. Generally speaking, a ton of companies start with similar themes & only a few will stand at the end of a few year period (remember all the auction sites that started after the success of eBay?).
Posted by Damon Billian on March 20th, 2007 at 10:07 am
I think there will both be a consolidation ad weeding out of some of the more mature tools AND a plethora of completely new tools, like Twitter, that move the ball forward into new territory.
Posted by Ed Terpening on March 21st, 2007 at 8:39 am
[...] I like the article on social media software and I know across our clients here at work it is great to have a list of potential partners to peruse. [...]
Posted by gregtyree.com » Blog Archive » Get back to blogging on March 21st, 2007 at 11:56 am