Could NewsTrust be a Digg Killer? (More layers of content filtering)
(Left: Fabrice demonstrates the application in the pleasant Miami afternoon.
The most interesting thing to me at WeMedia wasn’t the conference itself, it was NewsTrust.net a non profit news aggregator. I ran into Rory and Fabrice the creators of NewsTrust at the WeMedia conference. It’s got at three layers or content filtering to bring you the news that you want, as I understand it, here’s the three layers that I know of. Update: I just noticed that the Blog Herald is calling for transparency in news reporting. I believe that NewsTrust may have some of the features that could help here.
Rather than relying on just one Social Feature to provide filtered content, NewsTrust deploys at least three methods to sort out what’s important. To me, this looks like best of breed.
Layer 1: Content Pull
It’s a bottom up news site that aggregates content from blogs, traditional news sources. The pull content from TechMeme, news sources, and the wire. I hope they pull the categorized PodTech feeds as well.
Layer 2: Validated Editors and Submissions
The second layer has a real persona of editors that can vote and submit stories. Unlike Digg submitters, these users use their real name and have a real personas. There’s several attributes per editor that help to confirm the trust of the editor such as Activity, Experience, Ratings, Transparency, and Validation. Check out this example page of one editor.Layer 3: User rating
The users of the site can vote up and down content as well as provide reviews.
Users of the site (as well as editors) can review the content, vote it up and down to find content. Check out the Science and Tech Channel to learn more.
While still nascent, (A good user experience designer could really do wonders) this model to me contains some features that may be more effective than Digg, which recently removed their top 100 diggers due to corruption and payoffs. (Sounds like politics right?)
Being in Miami, the event demos were in the beautiful University of Miami’s campus, under some palm trees, with a flowing fountain in the background, with a backdrop of young beautiful tone and tanned college students.
Here’s some of the ’screenshots’ from their presentation and research. Note the graphs around ‘trust’.
6 Comments so far
Leave a reply
[…] Razz: Audio Mashup for Web and Mobile Allow people to mix their audio content with their voice. They’ve got three products: 1) Razz Mobile, it comes with 6 sounds that you can hit on your live calls so it’s audible to both the caller and receiver. There’s also a network based solution, that let’s folks select Mr. T, Jerky Boys, and other silly content. 2) Razz Mixer: There’s a mixer and soundboard so you can mix your voice with your own voice. When you post the code, there’s a player that emerges that can be embedded in a users blog and replace profile information. I believe that Odeo was in this space for a while. coRank I didn’t get to add this until the morning after, as my battery died at the event, so I had to switch to paper (gasp). CoRank lets you share with people that you trust, and that trust you. It’s sort of a digg evolution, as every user has their own customized front page (unlike Digg’s single page) and the stories are voted up and down by trusted peers. This tool looks for the wisdom of crowds, well really, one’s trusted network, as well as recommends content that people ‘like you’ also like. The presenter is apt to point out one of Digg’s (many) flaws, in that everyone is treated equally as an expert. That statement is somewhat true, Digg actually favors those that have had success in bringing highly rated stories over newbies. There’s also an alert section on the homepage that lets one find out when some of their content has been responded to. Did you see my review on newstrust? How about Google Reader’s shared items? It can hook into the coRank system. […]
[…] I reviewed NewsTrust which has multiple inputs of information from Mainstream and new media, all being mixed together with multiple layers of filtering. I was recently told about New Circles which is yet another tool to build news, this time with one’s trusted community. […]
[…] It was suggested I provide feedback so here’s a few things that could help it grow: -Cool user interface, seems standard in navigating and getting around, I wasn’t confused. -I like how users can create their own neighborhood, neat. -Caution: I see this site as replicating content that exists elsewhere, read my thoughts on community. -I hope they take a look at Topix, which aggregates local content, I’m sure it will scrape the content found in Hometown. -Create a local aggregator, so content can be scraped off the web and shown on the site -Pull in and display images tagged with local locations, some modern photo applications have geo coordinates in them -Content doesn’t only have to have news from the neighborhood only -Check out Chowhound and Yelp to pull restaurant reviews from those sites -Check out Craigslist.org and pull in content from those sites -Look at voting type features in addition to reviews, and build ‘best of’ lists for the bay area -This is listening and intelligence tool for CBS, the community will start to tell you what’s important, and what CBS should be covering in it’s mainstream news. -Bonus: check out what Newstrust is doing with their multiple layers of content filtering […]
[…] I explained that I believe that corporate websites are irrelevant, and that probably relates to news websites too. The future of websites will have all members of the community writing, adding, editing, and voting on it. This is why I’m closely following tools like PublicSquare, which allow just that (more news on that soon). I forgot to share with the group about newstrust, (my review of newstrust) which is a unique multi-tiered system that I was given a demo by the founders, it uses several sources of editorial layering. […]
[…] Curtain Number Six: Jeremiah Owyang What he said: “Could NewsTrust be a Digg […]
[…] “Could NewsTrust be a Digg Killer?” […]