Industry Analysis: Quicktake: What Google Buzz Means http://is.gd/81UpM 1 hr ago

Do companies Cultivate, Harness, Build, Engage, Lead, Visit, Watch, or Join Communities?

Categories: Community Marketing, Social MediaPosted on December 15th, 2006

No, this is not Web Strategy Mad libs…

Interesting dialogue happening with some thoughts leaders in Shel’s comments around the notion of how companies respond to communities that are forming.  I’ve been struggling with the right term to describe what companies should do.

At first, I thought because I was launching web tools, that the term ‘build’ was most appropriate.  Then Shel corrected me that some of these communities already exist, although certain fragments may not have been connected.  I later thought it was ‘harness’ which success a company could reign in and benefit.  In his wisdom, (and I should have known better) that a company does not control the customer or community, so harness is too forceful.  

Cultivate works well for me…this comes from my view as a community manager, who has to tend, grow, care, and weed.  I think this term came out of the closed community models such as forums and bulletin boards.  It may not apply to open community models such as massive social sites, and certainly not blogs. Many scared companies ‘watch’, and even ignorant ones don’t even do this.

Tara Hunt suggested ‘Be part’ or even “lead’ are great ideas. 

“I think about it this way, Companies must be part of the community they serve. They can even lead (some do an amazing job of it), but they must not play ‘visitor’.”

So far, I think she says it best.  Disucssions with a recent client suggest that the ‘visit’ aproach will indeed backfire, as once customers see you dip your toes in, you’ll be expected to stay. 

If you’re new to Social Media and Communities, Tara has thought leadership in her doctrine of Pinko Marketing, and Shel wrote the book Naked Conversations about business blogging, and has an upcoming book called Global Neighborhood that discusses how Social Media and the internet are shrinking the world. 

Share This Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • I like the "cultivate" thought, as it carries with it the sense of continuing engagement and enrichment.

    And yet I can't help feeling your discussion is getting hung up on a scroll through the various candidate verbs - should we Cultivate, Harness, Build, Engage, Lead, Visit, Watch, Join, Ignore, Paint, Stir-fry, Underwrite, Tickle, Corrugate, Moisten...?

    Bleh.

    You're right to credit Tara, I think. Her point comes closer: "companies must be part of...", but I think there's a very significant earlier step to consider.

    If companies want to participate, and be granted an opportunity to lead, the very first thing they have to do is figure out whether they genuinely have something of value to offer to the community in which they are interested.

    It almost distils down to fairly straightforward economic terms. Let's assume that a certain company (X) is interested in participating in a community (Y).

    X sees some value in engaging with Y; something tangible and of benefit to X.

    X is, therefore, morally obligated to offer Y some value.

    If X has nothing of enduring value to provide, it should leave Y the hell alone, and enjoy observing from the sidelines.

    JMHO, YMMV, etc.
  • Michael

    Of course a company has something of value to offer a community. It's somewhat assume that offering is a product or service. Somehow, I'll bet we can find some examples of some companies that failed to follow this rule.

    Oh, and just my preference, I like 'Moisten'...yeah!...Companies must 'Moisten' communities. Although the Chinese in me almost picked 'Stir-fry'.
  • Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! bguiokttxywwdr
blog comments powered by Disqus
site design by studionashvegas proudly powered by WordPress