If you look carefully, I'm in the front row of the running group. 1 hr ago

The Problem with Wikis is People

Categories: Web Theory, Web ToolsPosted on December 9th, 2006

Recently I had a conversation with a respected technologist about Web Strategy. We hammered in on wikis, as I said they were great for “Community Knowledge”.

There, that’s my definition: Wikis are great for Community Knowledge

He said wikis are broken. A few days ago, The Scoble Show Wiki on WetPaint kept on getting vandalized by some jerko. After I launched the Data Storage Industry wiki it kept on getting vandelized. Same thing for Wikipedia.

Also, some people have a hard time describing wikis. (By the way, it’s not about ‘collaboration’ that’s just part of the process to obtain community knowledge)

The problem with wikis is that people suck, and it takes just one person to damage the collective knowledge. It seems a little unbalanced that just one person could delete or alter nearly all of the content. Granted, one could revert the content, then the vandal will do it again, and again. It never ends until you clamp the community.

In my opinion, wikis only work when you have trusted members of your commnity (Likely they are already public or have an online reputation to uphold or want to earn) to manage content on a wiki.

In the case of Wikipedia, I believe there’s a large editorial force that self-policies the content, this is an example of one group representing the others for the collective.

Wikis will work when you:

  • Define a community and a limited content scope
  • Find trusted members and empower them to edit, or provide permissions.

Wikis will only work when it becomes a representative democracy.

Share This Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Apelisulley
    [b]Bill Bartmann – Opportunity Seeker – Spotting Profitable Opportunities[/b]


    Bill Bartmann asks, “If it’s such a great opportunity, why are you offering it to me?”


    Bill Bartmann says it is important to recognize an opportunity and to realize that every opportunity has a cost. Even profitable opportunities have their negatives; one must be able to see this and act accordingly.


    Bill Bartmann began his career as a self-made billionaire after recovering from a serious injury and being told he would never walk again. Five months later, he walked out of the hospital and got on the right path to financial success.


    Bill Bartmann’s path led him to an opportunity to become a billionaire in the debt collection businesses. Yes, this is an industry with a bad reputation; debt collectors are somewhere below politicians and scam artists. Since few people want to go into this business, Bartmann saw an opportunity for less competition and more profit.


    Bill Bartmann broke the mold and redefined the debt collections industry to make over a billion dollars. His company earned the praise of Working Woman Magazine for being the “Top 100 Best Companies for Working Mothers.”


    Bill Bartmann wants to share an opportunity with the world, including ordinary citizens, beginning and seasoned investors and entrepreneurs. Anyone can make money buying bad loans for pennies on the dollar.


    Bill Bartmann made his fortune in ‘90s, buying defaulted loans during the last big-time government bailout. This time around:


    The Bailout is Much BIGGER
    Opportunities for profit are Much GREATER
    You have a Roadmap to Wealth in the form of Bill Bartmann’s book, Bailout Riches!


    Bill Bartmann is the author of Bailout Riches: How Everyday Investors Can Make a Fortune Buying Bad Loans for Pennies on the Dollar. The book recently became an Amazon #1 world-wide best-seller. Bill Bartmann has been in every major newspaper and is frequently interviewed on television.


    Here is your opportunity to get your roadmap to wealth with Bill Bartmann’s Book, Bailout Riches! http://www.roadtomajorwealth.com
  • Heh, interesting additions here...

    http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/km/elsua/archives/th...
  • Within an intranet, the people can also be a problem... such as a case where a wiki intranet is too much of an abrupt change from the basic former "word of mouth" intranet. I freakin' love wikis, but I'm noticing that when those that don't care for them are left out of the knowledge share, it's a problem.
  • Not all people suck, but the ones that do suck ruin it for everyone else.

    More on this later...
  • Yes, and that's why they work well in intra-company organizational settings - you know who's participating and you're keeping tight security and admission control.

    If there's misbehaving HR knows what to do ...

    The thing that is interesting me most, is when wikis are employed to assist in open innovation efforts, i.e. collaborative innovation with customers, partners etc. Then you want and need to open up, if you're too restrictive you've got the problem that only a small group can participate, if you're too open you may run into this "people suck" problem ...

    "people suck" - nice wording, I like this, but those people are all we've got ;)
blog comments powered by Disqus
site design by studionashvegas proudly powered by WordPress