Some folks like Tuttle (who’s spearheading this), Scoble, and The Obvious are trying to manipulate the Google search results.
Background info
A defaming website against Martin Luther King (A great man, who stood up for great things) is gaining in search results. Folks are bombing (excessive and un-natural linking) to the websites they feel are appropriate.
While I disagree with the defaming Martin Luther site, here’s why Google bombing is hurting your cause
- Google folks don’t like unnatural linking behavior, they may counteract this by making the links you’re bombing at a lower rating
- You’ve just raised awareness to a website that I had not known about,
- As a natural human instinct, I went to go seek this website to learn more.
- From a marketing standpoint, that’s a win for ‘awareness’
- Folks are less likely to Google Bomb to support a cause, than to link to a website in natural blog conversation.
Recommendations
Why not start a campaign blog against the defaming website, calling out all the problems with it. Use similar names and link to it a whole lot. Overtime, your site will be linked, ranked, and will show up in search results around the defame site. Then, we can link to this blog that tells the truth to overcome and fight this website. Also tag the websites in Delicious, leave notes on other sites pointing to the site demonstrating it’s a fraud.
This is a typical blog business tactic, fight fire with fire, rather than trying to undermine the ’system’.
Update Jan 26th 2007: Although a few months premature, I was right.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 21st, 2006 at 9:24 am and is filed under Feedback, Social Media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
5 Responses to “Why Google Bombing Doesn’t Work”
Leave a Reply
- Advertising
- Aggregation
- Analyst
- API
- Asia
- Blogger Dinner
- Career
- Case Study
- Challenges
- Citizen Journalism
- Collaboration
- Community Manager
- Community Marketing
- Conference
- Content Management System
- Content Management Systems
- Curated Social Content
- Data Portability
- Data Storage
- Digest
- eCommerce
- Economy
- Enterprise Web
- Ethics
- Europe
- Events
- Extranet
- Facebook Strategy
- Fansumer
- FAQ
- Feedback
- Forrester
- Funding
- Future of Social Web
- Generations
- Geo Tagging
- Global Web
- Groundswell
- Hitachi
- Hitachi Data Systems
- Identity
- Industry Index
- Information Architecture
- Intelligent Web
- Interactive Marketing
- Interview
- Intranet
- IPTV
- IT
- Job Survey
- Live Video
- Mashups
- Media 2.0
- Microformat
- MicroMedia
- MicroMeme
- Mmorpg
- Mobile
- MySpace
- Non Profit
- On the move
- OpenSocial
- Other
- Personalization
- Platform
- Podcasts
- Podtech
- Politics
- Pollination
- PR
- Privacy
- Process
- Publication
- Quicktake
- Reading Sampler
- Rich Media
- Ruminations
- Search Strategy
- Second Life
- Security
- Silicon Valley Sightings
- Social CMS
- Social Computing
- Social CRM
- Social Graph
- Social Media
- Social Media Job
- Social Media Measurement
- Social Media Services
- Social Media Stats
- Social Networking
- storyboard
- Sustainable
- Syndication
- Technographics
- Technology
- Travel
- Trends
- User Experience
- VCs
- Venture Capital
- Video
- Virtual World
- Voice of the Customer
- VoIP
- Walkthrough
- Web Advertising
- Web Analytics
- Web Design
- Web Industry
- Web Law
- Web Marketing
- Web Strategy
- Web Strategy Show
- Web Team
- Web Theory
- Web Tools
- Web Usage
- White Label Social Network
- Widget Strategy
- Wireless
- Word of Mouth
- Word of Mouth Marketing
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
-
Jobs for the Web Strategist- Copywriter (part time) at Carroll Enterprises, Inc. (Worcester, Massachusetts)
- Social Media Project Manager at Creative Labs, Inc. (Milpitas, California)
- Director of Social Media Marketing at PTC (Massachusetts)
- 2166 Global Digital Communications Manager at Ford Motor Company (Dearborn, Michigan)
- Online Connection Pastor at LifeChurch.tv (Edmond, Oklahoma)
- Search Marketing Analyst at OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network (Los Angeles, California)
- Fees from these job postings pay for web hosting
-
My Flickr Photos
About
Jeremiah Owyang
Silicon Valley
The views expressed on this website/weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer, Forrester Research.













I too did not know about that site and sought it out. A definite win for the that movement.
I think your recommendations are the way to go when dealing with sites like this. Google bombing doesn’t change the underlying issues here and that is what needs to be looked at.
Posted by Julio Garcia on November 21st, 2006 at 11:03 am
This has worked in the past however. For instance, there used to be a hate site at the top of the search results for “Jew”. Enough people Google bombed the Wikipedia article so that this is no longer an issue.
Posted by Jake on November 21st, 2006 at 12:38 pm
Good points. I wouldn’t do this in a business context. It probably would backfire. It’ll be interesting to see what happens over the next few weeks to the ranking for the search term, though.
Posted by Robert Scoble on November 21st, 2006 at 8:13 pm
Julio, agreed.
Jake, what makes you think Google didn’t manipulate it? They have a motto “do no evil”, perhaps they influenced it?
Robert…I’m sure you’ll make an impact, you’re below 20 in technorati and have a page rank of 8. sheeesh
Posted by jeremiah_owyang on November 22nd, 2006 at 5:55 am
Jeremiah, GoogleBombing does work on a number of levels. Along with the example cited, Google “french military victories,” “waffles,” “failure,” or “miserable failure,” and you’ll see long lasting examples of successful GoogleBombs.
Posted by David Berkowitz on November 22nd, 2006 at 8:53 am